Every day we read the world's top institutional research and distill it into one number anyone can understand. Making global risk legible — so your household stays steady.
Scan with WeChat to open and share
| Institution | Figure | Definition | Date |
|---|
Two reminders: ① These figures use different definitions — they cannot be added or directly compared; we blend them only through our proprietary factor-attribution algorithm, for reference only. ② They all concern a "US recession", not a "global financial crisis".
| Indicator | Current | Risk percentile | Updated |
|---|
| Date | Event | Reading |
|---|
How to read this table: it measures how thick the storm clouds are (how much risk has accumulated). Bubble peaks read high, while the depths of a crisis read low — by late 2008, rates had been cut to zero and oil and valuations had collapsed, so the "risk build-up" indicators naturally fell back.
Humanity's track record at predicting crises is poor. An IMF study (WP/18/39) covering 153 recessions across 63 countries from 1992–2014 found that only 5 were foreseen by consensus forecasts a year in advance — a miss rate of about 97%. Therefore:
This index is an open data product. Media, creators and researchers are welcome to cite its readings and charts free of charge, under two conditions:
① Attribute the source: "Global Crisis Index" with globalcrisisindex.co.uk. ② Do not alter figures or bands, and do not present the reading as a "crash probability" or any investment signal.
For commercial use (in-app or terminal embedding, etc.), please obtain authorization first: [email protected].